BREAKING
Kolkata Ring Road Project 75% Complete, Fast-Track Link Opens Ahead of Schedule|Kolkata Metro Green Line: Commercial Services to Howrah Maidan Commence with Record Turnout|East Bengal vs Mohun Bagan: High-Voltage Kolkata Derby Scheduled for This Weekend at Salt Lake Stadium|Durga Puja 2026: North & South Kolkata Pandals Unveil Eco-Friendly Thematic Showcases|New Town Tech Corridor: Global IT Giants Announce 5,000+ New Job Openings This Quarter|Weather Alert: Pleasant Evening Breeze Forecast Across South Bengal and City Coast|Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Airport Expands Contactless DigiYatra Terminal 2 Gates|Heritage Revival: Historic Tramway Line Recommissioning Approved by Transport Department|KMC Launches 24/7 Digital Citizen Portal for Instant Municipal Grievance Resolution|Hilsa Fish Supplies Surge in City Wholesale Markets, Bringing Relief to Consumers|Smart City Mission: Kolkata Ranks Among Top Urban Digital Centers Nationwide|Fire Safety Audit: Comprehensive Inspections Initiated Across Central Kolkata Markets|
Our Kolkata
PoliticsLIVE UPDATEVerified by OurKolkata Newsroom

Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL against Mamata Banerjee over Hadi murder remarks

A public‑interest litigation challenging Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee’s comments on the murder of a man named Hadi has been rejected by the Calcutta High Court. The court found the petition lacked sufficient grounds to hold the CM liable and dismissed the case. The decision comes amid continued debate over the CM’s remarks and the legal accountability of political leaders for their statements.

Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL against Mamata Banerjee over Hadi murder remarks
Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL against Mamata Banerjee over Hadi murder remarksPhoto via The Times of India

The Calcutta High Court, in a recent judgment, threw out a public‑interest litigation filed against West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. The PIL sought to hold the CM responsible for remarks she made regarding the murder of a person named Hadi. Court officials explained that the petition did not meet the necessary legal criteria and was therefore dismissed.

The petitioner had argued that the CM’s statements were defamatory and warranted legal scrutiny. However, the court noted that the claims lacked sufficient evidence and that the petitioner did not have a direct stake in the matter. Consequently, the court declined to entertain the case.

The dismissal underscores the High Court’s stance on the limits of judicial intervention in political commentary. While the ruling does not address the broader issue of the murder investigation, it closes the immediate legal challenge against the CM’s remarks.

Was this story useful?
Share on WhatsApp